Citizenship Amendment Act: Why you need religion as a label to define and identify cruelty?

By

Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 is providing a path to Indian citizenships to persecuted Hindu refugees. As a secular country, how it matters, one is Hindu, Muslim or any other religion.





Can't we coin the draft something like this:





Anyone who is prosecuted based on religion and has spent a minimum of 5 years in India can apply for citizenship. You can get your citizenship after the evaluation of the authenticity of your appeal.





It's a suggestion, and can also be further improved.





Policies are the mental models, it gives the guidance of how we think and operate, it should be precise and unambiguous without room for confusion, and should give an objective truth that doesn't change with time.





Allowing citizenship based on religion generates wrong mental models, and creates uncertainty for other religions. The first principle is don't allow cruelty, it doesn't matter whether you are Muslim or Hindu. Now, Hindus are being prosecuted by some Muslim countries, you never know in the future, it can be people with some other religion or way of living.





This is the definition of Refugee.





A refugee is someone who has been forced to flee his or her country because of persecution, war or violence. A refugee has a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group. Most likely, they cannot return home or are afraid to do so. War and ethnic, tribal and religious violence are leading causes of refugees fleeing their countries.

https://www.unrefugees.org/refugee-facts/what-is-a-refugee/




How refugee of one religion is different from refugee from other religion? Is it not utter discrimination and bias towards a particular religion (e.g. Muslims here). Isn't it unscientific to label and include people based on religion, where all refugee have the same or similar problem?





Excerpt from CAA




The law can also be interpreted as it creates a cutoff of 31st Dec, 2014, and law becomes inoperative after the date, and it decreases that lengthy time for getting citizenship for these religions. But the bias towards Muslim is apparent here.





Yes, they all will go through the process, irrespective of religion, there are lots of technicalities involved in it. It's the process that creates trouble, and the draft does nothing about it. The draft is unnecessary and meant to build chaos and confusion, instead, they should be busy planning and streamlining the process, defining the steps, using technology to increase efficiency, understanding their problem, if they are really interested in well being of Hindu or Muslim or any refugees. People are not going to get a good living just by getting citizenship.





If we had a fair democracy led by scientists and researchers, such law would never have made, and if there were a problem, it would have revised within an hour or kept in hold for collecting further evidence and solutions.

https://iambrainstorming.wordpress.com/2019/01/09/from-hypocrisy-to-democracy-this-way-delegated-proof-of-stake-2/





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The whole process of voting in a DPoS Country

By
Image
The overview of fair democracy: https://iambrainstorming.wordpress.com/from-hypocrisy-to-democracy-this-way-delegated-proof-of-stake-2/   Evolutionary democracy using hierarchical specialization with adapted delegated proof of stake algorithm, where different specialized departments are in a symbiotic or mutually beneficial relationship.  The Tree of Democracy Each funnel is a department with its subdepartments A Department For example, the education department can have its sub-departments such as kid education, adult education, research, entrepreneurship. Each department consists of large outer representatives and a few inner representatives. These large outer representatives are the grand total of all its sub-department outer representatives and the few inner representatives are the grand totals of all its sub-department inner representatives. Inner representatives of center and state are policy approver,   and inner representatives of all the regions (center, state, ...
Read more

A new fair democracy inspired by Delegated Proof of Stake algorithm

By
Image
Preprint link: https://osf.io/82mpk/ dem·oc·racy [democracy democracies] 1) fair and equal treatment of everyone in a country or organization, etc, and their right to take part in making decisions 2) a system of government in which all the people of a country can vote to elect their representatives Yes, most democratic countries fulfill the second definition of democracy, but none to the first definition. Abstract: Democracy is about fair and equal treatment of everyone in a country. But it becomes unrealistic to achieve when political parties have their conflict of interest , and leaders don't have the expertise to make evidence-based policies and neither have the skill and manpower for solving problems that surround our society and ecosystem. The new fair democracy provides an elegant way of governance that separates the representative responsibility according to their specialization and can grow into any complexity. The governance is divided into various departments, and each ...
Read more

Importance of educational videos and solving its limitation by teachers assistance

By
Image
Many technologies have promised to revolutionize education, but so far none has. With that in mind, what could revolutionize education? Why educational videos don't work? 1) Procrastination : Educational videos give freedom of anytime learning, but this can lead to procrastination. According to Parkinson's Law: "Work expands to fill the time available for its completion". But in case of video lectures or MOOCs there is no limit of time, so usually, we procrastinate. Limiting time to complete the MOOCs is also a bad idea, as it takes away its advantage of any time and anywhere learning. 2) Lack of a social interaction : We share emotions, feelings, discuss with the teacher, friends that come to our mind just like a true social animal and classroom brings a social two-way interaction, but it doesn't happen in case of MOOCs. 3) Answerability : No one is there to keep you accountable for finishing the course, no outward push, everything lies with intrinsic motivation...
Read more